June 2008 - Older Brain Really May Be a  Wiser Brain
                        Back to Newsletter 
                        How good is your memory? If you’re over 50, and your memory doesn't seem to be as sharp as it use  to be, you may have just thought it is a sign of age, but not necessarily.  Memory issues are a big reason why clients come in to see me for hypnosis, both  younger and older people. Some people want to overcome test anxiety. Others are  professionals who need to remember critical information for their patients or  customers. Still others have taken on the belief early in school, that they  have a poor memory and so they continue to demonstrate this belief because they  believe it to be true. 
However, if you’re over 50, here is good news from a recent  New York Times online article. 
                        Older Brain  Really May Be a Wiser Brain 
                            New York Times  Online…. 
                          By SARA REISTAD-LONG 
                          Published: May 20, 2008 
                        When older people can no longer remember names at a cocktail  party, they tend to think that their brainpower is declining. But a growing  number of studies suggest that this assumption is often wrong. 
                        Instead, the research finds, the aging brain is simply  taking in more data and trying to sift through a clutter of information, often  to its long-term benefit. 
                        The studies are analyzed in a new edition of a neurology  book, “Progress in Brain Research.” 
                        Some brains do deteriorate with age. Alzheimer’s disease,  for example, strikes 13 percent of Americans 65 and older. But for most aging  adults, the authors say, much of what occurs is a gradually widening focus of  attention that makes it more difficult to latch onto just one fact, like a name  or a telephone number. Although that can be frustrating, it is often useful. 
                        “It may be that distractibility is not, in fact, a bad  thing,” said Shelley H. Carson, a psychology researcher at Harvard whose work  was cited in the book. “It may increase the amount of information available to  the conscious mind.” 
                        For example, in studies where subjects are asked to read  passages that are interrupted with unexpected words or phrases, adults 60 and  older work much more slowly than college students. Although the students plow  through the texts at a consistent speed regardless of what the out-of-place  words mean, older people slow down even more when the words are related to the  topic at hand. That indicates that they are not just stumbling over the extra  information, but are taking it in and processing it. 
                        When both groups were later asked questions for which the out-of-place  words might be answers, the older adults responded much better than the  students. 
                        “For the young people, it’s as if the distraction never  happened,” said an author of the review, Lynn Hasher, a professor of psychology  at the University   of Toronto and a senior  scientist at the Rotman Research Institute. “But for older adults, because  they’ve retained all this extra data, they’re now suddenly the better problem  solvers. They can transfer the information they’ve soaked up from one situation  to another.” 
                        Such tendencies can yield big advantages in the real world,  where it is not always clear what information is important, or will become  important. A seemingly irrelevant point or suggestion in a memo can take on new  meaning if the original plan changes. Or extra details that stole your  attention, like others’ yawning and fidgeting, may help you assess the  speaker’s real impact. 
                        “A broad attention span may enable older adults to  ultimately know more about a situation and the indirect message of what’s going  on than their younger peers,” Dr. Hasher said. “We believe that this  characteristic may play a significant role in why we think of older people as  wiser.” 
                        In a 2003 study at Harvard, Dr. Carson and other researchers  tested students’ ability to tune out irrelevant information when exposed to a  barrage of stimuli. The more creative the students were thought to be,  determined by a questionnaire on past achievements, the more trouble they had  ignoring the unwanted data. A reduced ability to filter and set priorities, the  scientists concluded, could contribute to original thinking. 
                        This phenomenon, Dr. Carson said, is often linked to a  decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex. Studies have found that people who  suffered an injury or disease that lowered activity in that region became more  interested in creative pursuits. 
                        Jacqui Smith, a professor of psychology and research  professor at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan,  who was not involved in the current research, said there was a word for what  results when the mind is able to assimilate data and put it in its proper place  — wisdom. 
                        “These findings are all very consistent with the context  we’re building for what wisdom is,” she said. “If older people are taking in  more information from a situation, and they’re then able to combine it with  their comparatively greater store of general knowledge, they’re going to have a  nice advantage.” 
                        From: New York Times 5/20/08                         
                      Back to Newsletter  |